Pages

Showing posts with label ishrat jahan. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ishrat jahan. Show all posts

Friday, 12 February 2016

MHA refuses to sanction prosecution of Rajinder Kumar in Ishrat Jahan case

While refusing to sanction prosecution of former IB special director Rajinder Kumar in the Ishrat Jahan encounter case, the Union home ministry had raised a few objections to the CBI theory that Kumar and three other IB officials had hatched a criminal conspiracy with Gujarat police officers for staging an encounter. 
According to a five-page note that gave a clean chit to Kumar, which ET has accessed, MHA said, "with respect to the bag containing the arms and ammunition handed over by Kumar to GL Singhal, then ACP of Gujarat police, witness Nizamuddin had not seen the contents of the bag and as such it cannot be stated conclusively that the arms and ammunitions shown as seized from the scene of encounter were the same as those provided by Kumar to Singhal." 

Ruling out there was "no case is made out against Kumar" the home minister also said that CBI was not been able to provide the source of arms seized. 

The agency claimed before the home ministry that it had made efforts to trace the source of arms but no relevant evidence was obtained. Kumar, in his first interaction to the media after terrorist-turned-approver Headley's claims, had told ET on Thursday that the UPA government wanted to fix its main political opponent, Narendra Modi, and  some senior officers of CBI were lured with post-retirement benefits to 'pad up' evidence. 

Headley in his video deposition before a Mumbai court had alleged that Ishrat was a member of Lashkar-e-Toiba suicide squad. According to CBI, Kumar was not present at the scene of crime and substantive part of the evidence was "circumstantial". 
"The CBI has admitted that official duty of the Kumar required him to generate intelligence on terrorist activities and pass on the same to state police authorities for operational purposes," the home ministry observed while declining the sanction against Kumar.

Commenting on the findings of the CBI, MHA further stated that investigating agency has not provided any corroborative evidence to sustain the allegations of conspiracy against Kumar. 


Thursday, 11 February 2016

Former Home Secretary RK Singh backs David Headley's claim on Ishrat Jahan

Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) leader and former home secretary RK Singh on Thursday said his earlier assertion that Ishrat Jahan was a terrorist stands vindicated with 26/11 conspirator David Coleman Headley's revealing before a Special Mumbai Court that she was a LeT operative.

"This has been my stand all along. I got into this because some IB officers were being prosecuted and as home secretary, I felt that they were wrongly prosecuted because these people were all terrorists," Singh told ANI."Two of these people had come from across the border. She was with them and there was another man, an Indian origin terrorist, with whom she was living. We had no doubt at all that all these people were terrorist. That's why I stood for my officers and said that this was not a fake encounter and all these people were terrorists," he added.

He also said that some people were playing politics at that time and portrayed Ishrat Jahan as an innocent lady.

The incident had occurred in 2004 when Prime Minister Narendra Modi was the chief minister of Gujarat while Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) president Amit Shah was the state Home Minister.

Shah's name had cropped up in the Ishrat Jahan alleged fake encounter case. The CBI, however, in 2014 gave a clean chit to the BJP president citing insufficient evidence. The CBI had submitted that Shah was not named in the FIR.

It was on June 15, 2004, that Ishrat Jahan Raza and three others Pranesh Pillai (alias Javed Gulam Sheikh), Amjad Ali Rana and Zeeshan Johar were killed in an encounter by the Ahmedabad Police.

The Gujarat Police stated that Ishrat, along with three other people, had been gunned down near Ahmedabad by a police team belonging to the Detection of Crime Branch (DCB) of the Ahmedabad City Police.

The police claimed that the four were connected with the Lashkar-e-Taiba and had come to Gujarat to assassinate the then chief minister Narendra Modi in order to avenge the communal riots of 2002 which had led to the deaths of numerous Muslims.

A report was submitted by Metropolitan Magistrate S.P. Tamang in the Ahmedabad metropolitan court on September 7, 2009, which said that the four persons were killed in police custody.

The Ahmedabad metropolitan court ruled that Ishrat's killing was a fake encounter. Tamang's report said the Crime Branch police kidnapped Ishrat and the others from Mumbai on June 12, 2004, and brought them to Ahmedabad. Tamang said that there was no evidence to link the victims with the LeT. There was also nothing to indicate that they had come to Gujarat to kill Modi.

The Gujarat Government challenged the report of the metropolitan magistrate, saying that the policemen accused of fake encounter were not given an opportunity to present their side of the arguments. The Gujarat Government's petition in the High Court against Tamang's report said that it should be scrapped as it was 'illegal and doubtful'.

Gujarat High Court stated that Ishrat Jahan's encounter case was of national importance and ordered the police witnesses to be posted where they would not be working as subordinates to officials accused in the case.

A Special Investigation Team (SIT), headed by Karnail Singh, was set up to probe the case further. The SIT sent four teams to Srinagar, Delhi, Lucknow and Nashik to probe Ishrat's alleged terrorist links.

On November 21, 2011, the SIT told the Gujarat High Court that the Ishrat Jahan encounter was not genuine. After the SIT filed its report, the High Court ordered that a complaint under Indian Penal Code Section 302 (murder) has to be filed against those involved in the fake encounter, in which over 20 policemen, including senior IPS officers, were involved.

Wednesday, 10 February 2016

Ishrat Jehan was LeT operative: David Headley deposes in Mumbai court on third day

In an explosive disclosure on Thursday, Pakistani-American terrorist David Headley told the Mumbai court that there was an LeT operation to shoot police at some naka. During his deposition, he refered to a woman killed in a police encounter on Indian soil. When he was given three names, he claimed that the name of the woman was Ishrat Jahan. Ishrat's family, since the encounter took place in 2004, has been alleging that it was a botched up operation by the Gujarat Police.

"One woman from LeT named Ishrat Jahan was involved," Headley said.

Headley denied involvement of any woman suicide bomber in LeT on being asked by Ujjwal Nikam. But later he named Ishrat Jahan as LeT operative who was involved in an operation about shooting police at "some naka."

CNN-IBN got in touch with Ishrat's sister, Musarrat Jahan and asked her what she thinks of Headley's disclosure. "We are fighting a legal battle for the past 11 years. The investigation in India (all of them) have proven that the encounter was fake and I believe that my sister is innocent. Who is this Headley? Ye sab political saazish hai. Bahut bade log hai is saazish ke peeche aur Headley ka zaroor koi fayda hai, (This is all a big political conspiracy. Big political names are behind this conspiracy and Headley is definitely gaining from this so-called disclosure)," Musarrat told CNN-IBN.

According to Vrinda Grover, who is the lawyer of Ishrat Jahan's mother, told NDTV that Ishrat cannot be linked to any terror group across the world. "There's political agenda behind Headley's questioning. Ishrat has no terror links. Ujjwal Nikam's questioning is illegal," Grover told the channel.

Ishrat, Javed Sheikh alias Pranesh Pillai and two Pakistani nationals Amjad Ali Rana and Zeeshan Jowher were gunned down at Kotarpur in Ahmedabad on June 15, 2004.

Headley was deposing for the third day before a court in Mumbai.

Soon after Headley's statement BJP sprung to action and its spokersperson Shahnawaz Hussain said that it supports what many people have been saying in Gujarat for a long time. It should be noted that the "fake encounter" of Ishrat Jahan in 2004, which was ordered by the then Gujarat government, received wide coverage by the media and faced lot of flak from human rights' activists.

The deposition of Headley could not happen on Wednesday due to a technical snag in the video conference in the US.

David Coleman Headley. AgenciesDavid Coleman Headley. Agencies

Making fresh disclosures on the brazen 26/11 attacks, Headley also exposed how ISI and LeT majorly funded terror operations in India and financed him from time to time and that Pakistan native Tahawwur Rana visited Mumbai before the terror strikes.

The LeT operative also said that RBI has turned down a request to open a bank account for their office in India. Giving details of his funding, he said, "Before coming to India in September 2006, he received USD 25,000 from ISI's Major Iqbal."

"I also got 40,000 in Pakistani currency from LeT operative Sajid Mir between April and June 2008," he told the court, adding that Major Iqbal used to regularly sent him money in instalments.

Also, Major Iqbal gave me counterfeit Indian currency once or twice in 2008, he said. Besides Abdul Rehman Pasha, also from ISI, gave me Rs 80,000, Headley said.

"Tahawur Rana (Headley's associate and a Pakistani native who operated a Chicago-based immigration business) used to send me money from the US in September 2006 when I came to India to do intelligence work on instructions of LeT," he told the court.

The 55-year-old, who recently turned approver in the case, also said that "it was my idea to open an office in India. It was a part of my cover (as an immigration consultant). I had discussed about this with Major Iqbal and Sajid Mir and they both agreed to it."

"I also told Rana that Major Iqbal had asked me to do intelligence work in India. Iqbal told me that if Rana was reluctant to be associated with this (Headley's India operations) then he (Headley) should appeal to his (Rana's) sense of patriotism towards Pakistan," he testified.

"But Rana was not reluctant and he agreed readily for me to go to India," Headley said.

Headley also revealed that Rana had visited Mumbai before the terror attacks.

"I advised Rana to leave India before the attacks as I was afraid that he would be in danger," he told the court.
Headley also disclosed that Rana had asked Raymond Sanders (who ran an immigrant law centre in Chicago) to submit an application to the RBI to open a bank account for their office in India.

However, RBI turned down the request, he said.

Later, in January 2009, Major Iqbal told Headley to close down his office in India, the court was told.
Earlier on Tuesday, Headley had told the court that terror outfits like LeT, Jaish-e-Mohammad and Hizbul Mujahideen were given moral, financial and military support by the Pakistani intelligence agency besides making fresh revelations including about an aborted plan to target Indian defence scientists and famous Siddhivinayak temple here.

He said he was working for ISI besides LeT (Lashkar-e-Taiba) and that he knew about ISI official Brigadier Riyaz being the handler of LeT's top commander Zaki-ur-Rehman Lakhvi, who was the mastermind of the November 26, 2008 attacks in Mumbai.

He named three officials of the Pakistan army and ISI -- Colonel Shah, Lt Colonel Hamza and Major Samir Ali - besides retired army officer Abdul Rehman Pasha who was closely working with LeT and Al-Qaeda. Headley said his assessment was that ISI and LeT were coordinating with each other.

"ISI provides financial, military and moral support to terror outfits Jaish-e-Mohammed, LeT and Hizbul Mujaideen," he said, even though he claimed that his opinion was formed on the basis of hearsay.
Headley also said that Abdur Rehman Pasha, a retired Pakistani army major, gave him Rs 18,000. "On 1 November 2006 I signed the agreement of my office in Tardeo area of Mumbai, with landlord Bora. The contents I had mentioned in the agreement of my office in Mumbai's Tardeo area, were true," Headley told the court.

"On 16 July 2008,I applied for extension of license (Mumbai office) to stay in premises and extension was granted. An application was submitted to Reserve Bank of India to open a business account in India with signatures of Raymond Sanders but RBI refused to give permission to open a business account."

Headley, who had conducted recce of the places in Mumbai which were attacked by 10 LeT terrorists on November 26, 2008, also revealed that the outfit had initially planned to attack a conference of Indian Indian defence scientists in Taj Mahal Hotel.

He said he had also conducted a recce of the famous Siddhivinayak Temple and Naval air station on directions of LeT commanders.

While spilling beans about involvement of Pakistan's army and intelligence agency in terrorism in India, he said he knew ISI official Brigadier Riyaz being the handler of LeT's top commander Zaki-ur-Rehman Lakhvi, who was the mastermind of 26/11 attacks.

Headley, who had visited Mumbai seven times to scout for targets, revealed that plans to target Mumbai had started over a year before 26/11.